lowcorsa wrote:Hi,
I have 3 pics I could do with a bit of help with. I took these on a walk through some fields along Scotch Hills in Barton under Needwood. I have no clue what any of them are. I am in the process of creating a photography book on animals and these will be goin in the book if I can find the ID's.The colours may be abit more orange/red that they naturally are this is due to light and the processing.
Carl

Hi Carl,
As these are your first posts let me welcome you to the forum. We are a very friendly bunch on here and you'll find plenty of help and advice freely given by the members.That said, you will probably not appreciate what I am about to say next, but my comments are made with the best of intentions and represent my own personal viewpoint not that of the forum. If the photography book on animals is for your own or family/friends use, then fine and please ignore the rest of this posting.
However, as a keen bibliophile myself, I wonder what is the purpose of your book? Is it is a book on the techniques of photographing animals or a book of photographs of animals? I believe that, whilst these images might be OK for identification purposes, the quality of these images is not up to the standard required for publication in a book. Carl, I believe that there are already enough poor quality books out there and I also have quite strong feelings that no author should be producing books on subjects which they
have no clue about. In addition, for publication purposes the colours need to be as natural as possible unless deliberately altered for their creative effect.
Notwithstanding the above Carl, stick with the forum and with the help and advice given by members, you will soon find that your images will improve to a standard which would be acceptable for publication. However, you'll have to do a lot of background reading to become more familiar with your subject matter if you really want to succeed especially in the field of natural history subjects
